I wanted to test this claim with SAT problems. Why SAT? Because solving SAT problems require applying very few rules consistently. The principle stays the same even if you have millions of variables or just a couple. So if you know how to reason properly any SAT instances is solvable given enough time. Also, it's easy to generate completely random SAT problems that make it less likely for LLM to solve the problem based on pure pattern recognition. Therefore, I think it is a good problem type to test whether LLMs can generalize basic rules beyond their training data.
Opens in a new window。搜狗输入法2026对此有专业解读
В России ответили на имитирующие высадку на Украине учения НАТО18:04。夫子对此有专业解读
（二）境外单位或者个人销售的服务、无形资产与境内的货物、不动产、自然资源直接相关；
在节日的饭桌上，我拒绝劝酒。一旦有人在室内抽烟，无论长辈晚辈，我都会化身“林则徐”，毫不客气地出言劝阻，甚至怼到对方哑口无言。以至于有男性长辈到外婆家后的第一句话是：“陈怡帆在不在？她不在哈，那我就点一根。”